On Sat, 26 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, June 26, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2010, David Brownell wrote: > ... > > > > + The > > > > /sys/power/wakeup_count file allows user space to avoid > > > > + losing wakeup events > > > > when transitioning the system into a sleep > > > > + state. Reading > > > > This could have been phrased better: The /sys/power/wakeup_count file > > allows user space to put the system into a sleep state conditionally > > subject to the arrival of concurrent wakeup events, which will either > > block the sleep transition or cause it to fail. > > I'll chage this in the final version. Thanks! Even this should be simplified, if possible. Maybe something like: ... put the system into a sleep state while taking into account the concurrent arrival of wakeup events ... I tried to put the word "reliably" in there, but it didn't seem to fit. After all, the current /sys/power/state is already very reliable about putting the system to sleep! Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
