Divide tricky for-loop into readable if-blocks.
The logic to set multi_error_valid (to force walking pci bus
hierarchy to find 2nd~ error devices) is changed too, to check
MULTI_{,_UN}COR_RCV bit individually and to force walk only when
it is required.
And rework setting e_info->severity for uncorrectable, not to use
magic numbers.
v2: init multi_error_valid properly.
add some comments to note that aer_err_info is reused.
Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
index f5eb69f..ca14058 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
@@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
* Return true if found.
*
* Invoked by DPC when error is detected at the Root Port.
+ * Caller of this function must set id, severity, and multi_error_valid of
+ * struct aer_err_info pointed by @e_info properly. This function must fill
+ * e_info->error_dev_num and e_info->dev[], based on the given information.
*/
static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
struct aer_err_info *e_info)
@@ -215,6 +218,9 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
struct pci_dev *dev = parent;
int result;
+ /* Must reset in this function */
+ e_info->error_dev_num = 0;
+
/* Is Root Port an agent that sends error message? */
result = find_device_iter(dev, e_info);
if (result)
@@ -580,11 +586,14 @@ static struct aer_err_source *get_e_source(struct aer_rpc *rpc)
* @info: pointer to structure to store the error record
*
* Return 1 on success, 0 on error.
+ *
+ * Note that @info is reused among all error devices. Clear fields properly.
*/
static int get_device_error_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
{
int pos, temp;
+ /* Must reset in this function */
info->status = 0;
info->tlp_header_valid = 0;
@@ -657,11 +666,10 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct pcie_device *p_device,
struct aer_err_source *e_src)
{
struct aer_err_info *e_info;
- int i;
/* struct aer_err_info might be big, so we allocate it with slab */
e_info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct aer_err_info), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (e_info == NULL) {
+ if (!e_info) {
dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &p_device->port->dev,
"Can't allocate mem when processing AER errors\n");
return;
@@ -671,26 +679,33 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct pcie_device *p_device,
* There is a possibility that both correctable error and
* uncorrectable error being logged. Report correctable error first.
*/
- for (i = 1; i & ROOT_ERR_STATUS_MASKS ; i <<= 2) {
- if (i > 4)
- break;
- if (!(e_src->status & i))
- continue;
-
- memset(e_info, 0, sizeof(struct aer_err_info));
-
- /* Init comprehensive error information */
- if (i & PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV) {
- e_info->id = ERR_COR_ID(e_src->id);
- e_info->severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
- } else {
- e_info->id = ERR_UNCOR_ID(e_src->id);
- e_info->severity = ((e_src->status >> 6) & 1);
- }
- if (e_src->status &
- (PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV |
- PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_UNCOR_RCV))
+ if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV) {
+ e_info->id = ERR_COR_ID(e_src->id);
+ e_info->severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
+
+ if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV)
+ e_info->multi_error_valid = 1;
+ else
+ e_info->multi_error_valid = 0;
+
+ aer_print_port_info(p_device->port, e_info);
+
+ if (find_source_device(p_device->port, e_info))
+ aer_process_err_devices(p_device, e_info);
+ }
+
+ if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV) {
+ e_info->id = ERR_UNCOR_ID(e_src->id);
+
+ if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
+ e_info->severity = AER_FATAL;
+ else
+ e_info->severity = AER_NONFATAL;
+
+ if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_UNCOR_RCV)
e_info->multi_error_valid = 1;
+ else
+ e_info->multi_error_valid = 0;
aer_print_port_info(p_device->port, e_info);
--
1.7.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
