On 01/28/2010 08:24 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:02:26 -0600 > jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jeff Garrett) wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:24:09PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:50:17 -0800 (PST) >>> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: don't use ioh resource if only have one ioh >>>> >>>> Please, no. >>>> >>>> This patch is too ugly to live. >>>> >>>> And it's totally unacceptable to probe every single possible PCI device >>>> for something like this. >>>> >>>> If we don't know enough about the hardware workings of those Intel bridges >>>> to know when they are active and how they decode things, then please let's >>>> just disable intel_bus.c entirely. >>>> >>>> There's no excuse for hacky tests like this. >>> >>> Ok, we'll just kill it entirely then. I'll send a patch tomorrow >>> unless Yinghai beats me to it. >> >> What about something like this (works for me, without pci=use_crs)? >> >> --- >> Remove intel_bus.c Intel-specific PCI/IOH logic >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garrett <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Yeah, looks good. I'll push to Linus today. > please don't. will send you another patch, to keep the print out so we can cross check the _CRS. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
