On 01/15/2010 07:57 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> First, thank you very much for writing the summary in patch 0/11.
> I feel like I finally understand what you are trying to do with
> this series.
>
>> +/*
>> + * try to release pci bridge resources that is from leaf bridge,
>> + * so we can allocate big new one later
>> + */
>> +static void __ref pci_bus_release_bridge_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> + unsigned long type,
>> + enum release_type rel_type)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *dev;
>> + bool is_leaf_bridge = true;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>> + struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate;
>> + if (!b)
>> + continue;
>> +
>
> How about settting
>
> is_leaf_bridge = false;
>
> here, and then you don't need the repeated assignments below?
>
no
that is AND
>> + switch (dev->class >> 8) {
>> + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS:
>> + is_leaf_bridge = false;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI:
>> + default:
>> + is_leaf_bridge = false;
>> + if (rel_type == whole_subtree)
>> + pci_bus_release_bridge_resources(b, type,
>> + whole_subtree);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* The root bus? */
>> + if (!bus->self)
>> + return;
>
> Won't work correctly on a non-materialized root bridge.
>
> Use pci_is_root_bus() instead.
OK
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
