Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix >>>>>> >>>>>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it >>>>> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the >>>>> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue? >>>>> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work. >>>> that patch will be bullet proof... we need it. >>>> >>>> also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly. >>>> >>>> do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in >>>> second kernel? >>> Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT >>> complaints and NUMA works fine. >> do you need >> memmap=62G@4G >> in this case? > > Yes, I've needed that always. good, can you enable debug option in kexec to see why kexec can not pass whole 38? range to second kernel? YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
