On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix > >>>> > >>>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it > >>> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the > >>> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue? > >>> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work. > >> that patch will be bullet proof... we need it. > >> > >> also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly. > >> > >> do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in > >> second kernel? > > > > Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT > > complaints and NUMA works fine. > > > how about > > current kernel booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT > complaints and NUMA works fine. ? Yes, that's exactly what happens, see the previous reply I sent. mmconf still complains, though. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
