On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:54:03 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Next, IMO, you don't have any idea how maintainers will react to this > patch, because you CC'd so few of them. People who perform tree-wide > changes should take the time to CC __every__ relevant maintainer. If > you are changing somebody's code, you should always let them know > about it, and give them an opportunity to review the change. > scripts/get_maintainer.pl can help with this. > > So, while the PCI maintainer might agree with the nomenclature > change, he is not the most qualified person to state that your > changes have no effect on drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c, for example. Honestly I'm not thrilled about it either. Given the large downside of making many oustanding diffs conflict, I'm wary of these sorts of changes in general. I suggested to Stefan that he just put together one big patch to minimize that pain, but I didn't expect something so huge (I was thinking it would be mainly limited to PCI related files). -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html