Re: Help needed, Re: [Bug #14334] pcmcia suspend regression from 2.6.31.1 to 2.6.31.2 - Dell Inspiron 600m

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 14:39 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > That socket _is_ going to be suspended, and testing for it here just seems 
> > to confuse things. 
> > 
> > So I'd remove it from both early_resume and late_resume, and only keep it 
> > in the case of the legacy user-requested suspend/resume (do we even do 
> > that any more?).
> 
> OK, updated patch is appended.

Test by me delayed to tomorrow ... hit another suspend/resume bug on
that laptop which took away the time I had to do that test yesterday and
today I'm off :-)

(Bug was simple but took a while to track down: machine was left in
storage for a while, battery ran out, RTC went back to Jan 1, 1904,
which means a negative xtime, and the new timekeeping code will do
horrible things including hanging at resume when that happens. Fix is to
make powerpc read_persistent_clock() to ignore the RTC when it contains
a date older than epoch).

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux