Yinghai Lu wrote: >>> >>> Which means your patch would cause a regression in my setup. >> ok, may need to compare new range size and old range size before clear it. > > after closing look up the code, it looks it will not break your setup. > > 1. before the patches: > a. when master card is inserted, all bridge in that card will get assigned with min_size > b. when new cards is inserted to those slots in master card, will get assigned in the bridge size. > > 2. after the patches: v5 > a. booted up, all leaf bridge mmio get clearred. > b. when master card is inserted, all bridge in that card will get assigned with min_size, and master bridge will be sum of them > c. when new cards is inserted to those slots in master card, will get assigned in the bridge size. > > can you check those two patches in your setup to verify it? > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/56344/ > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/56343/ on top Jesse today's PCI tree. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
