On 20.08.2009 23:54, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:47 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > >> I'm more inclined to believe it's sloppiness on the part of the BIOS >> writers but thought this might be an alternative explanation. >> > > Nah, this is just the normal story: "We smoked too much crack and fried > our brains, and we don't do any QA on the crap we write because that > would leave fewer hours in the day for us to service our crack habit". > > We _really_ need open source firmware. > > Or at _least_ firmware written by competent engineers -- but I think > we've all fairly much given up on that happening by now? > coreboot is an open source (GPLv2) x86 lightweight firmware written in C (with optional BIOS and EFI compatibility modules if anyone cares). While it does not support all current x86 chipsets, it still does support quite a few mainboards. The developers are friendly and try to fix any reported bugs. There are two big obstacles until x86 world domination, though: A dozen core developers are simply not enough for the huge task (there are more open specs than developers can keep up with), and some chipset vendors don't open their specs. Anyone interested is invited to contribute and make the world a better place. Oh, and it supports packing a Linux kernel in the mainboard flash ROM for diskless/networkless booting (that coreboot+Linux combination was called LinuxBIOS some time ago). More information at http://www.coreboot.org/ Regards, Carl-Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
