Re: [PATCH 7] PM: Add a switch for disabling/enabling asynchronous suspend/resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:19:46PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Add sysfs attribute kernel/power/pm_async allowing the user space to
> disable and enable async suspend/resume of devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/main.c  |   13 +++++++------
>  drivers/base/power/power.h |    6 +++---
>  kernel/power/main.c        |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/main.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/main.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,29 @@ int pm_notifier_call_chain(unsigned long
>  			== NOTIFY_BAD) ? -EINVAL : 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* If set, devices may be suspended and resumed asynchronously. */
> +int pm_async_enabled = 1;
> +
> +static ssize_t pm_async_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> +			     char *buf)
> +{
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pm_async_enabled);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t pm_async_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> +			      const char *buf, size_t n)
> +{
> +	int val;
> +
> +	if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &val) == 1) {

I prefer more vigorous restrictions on the sysfs interfaces. Maybe:

	if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &val) || val > 1)
		return -EINVAL;

	pm_async_enabled = val;

?

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux