On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:46:34 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct > access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the > functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. > These functions have been around since the beginning, so are > backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. > > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c > b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c index e399825..13ffdc3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void pcie_device_init(struct pci_dev > *parent, struct pcie_device *dev, memset(device, 0, sizeof(struct > device)); device->bus = &pcie_port_bus_type; > device->driver = NULL; > - device->driver_data = NULL; > + dev_set_drvdata(device, NULL); > device->release = release_pcie_device; /* callback to > free pcie dev */ dev_set_name(device, "%s:pcie%02x", > pci_name(parent), get_descriptor_id(port_type, > service_type)); Looks like I already have this one in my linux-next branch, but I think Linus will handle any conflict that arises if this ends up coming from both of us. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
