On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:52:26 +0900 Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I found a obvious bug in pciehp's EMI(*) support. It's not difficult > to fix the bug, but instead of fixing it, I think EMI support in > pciehp should be removed because it seems not to be tested at all. > > (*) EMI: Electromechanical Interlock Untested code is broken code. Removed. If someone cares they can revert this patch, fix & *test* EMI, and resubmit a new patch. Thanks Kenji-san. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
