On Wed, 6 May 2009 14:45:58 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > so we could set io apic routing only when enable device irq. > > > > also could make setup_IO_APIC_irqs and setup_ioapic_dest only handle > > first ioapic... > > > > v2: remove one one not needed style change. > > merge the patch only setup io_apic for acpi on in > > setup_IO_APIC_irqs > > > > [ Impact: make mptable irq enable more like acpi is used, and > > numa_irq_desc could get correct node when acpi=off ] > > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 148 > > ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 84 ++++++++--------------- 2 > > files changed, 103 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-) > > Ok, i guess this makes sense with acpi-less bootup modes. > > There's hefty impact on io_apic.c and pci/irq.c as well. The io-apic > code already has a fair amount of changes queued up. Jesse: do you > have pci/irq.c changes queued up? If you agree with the patch, how > should we handle this? No I don't have anything recent... and since this stuff is intertwined with the io_apic changes I'm fine with it going through you guys. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
