On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:06:15 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Cool! Yinghai, mind (re-)sending the latest version of the > > remaining two patches, so what we can pick this up into the x86 > > tree and get it tested? I'd say it's for v2.6.31. (unless someone > > can think of a strong reason to do this sooner.) > > Hm, there's one patch in that lot that does: > > drivers/pci/bus.c | 8 +++++++- > drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 ++++++-- > drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 40 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 44 > insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Which should go via the PCI tree. > > I can set up an isolated x86/pci-gap topic that i'll send to Jesse > to pull (once it looks to be stable), as the other patches modify > the e820 code which we'd like to test in the x86 tree first. > > Jesse, Linus, Yinghai, does that look like a good plan to you? Yep, that's fine with me. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
