Yinghai Lu wrote: > > that need to do done much earlier, and much simple, just need to make that range to be reserved in e820. > and later e820_setup_gap even don't need to be aligned again. > As long as that doesn't cause the PCI layer to move devices already assigned in this range out of it. What we want is really a "weak reserve". On the other hand, that may very well be the semantics of the existing reserved space, too (I honestly haven't looked lately.) -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
