I have no clue what the original intent here was, but the code as
written is useless.
The old dbg() statement above the old callsite might lead one to think
that at one point, there was supposed to be some recursion, but any
sense of sanity here has been lost to the ravages of time.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c | 14 ++------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c
index 6201281..3e3acc7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c
@@ -193,16 +193,6 @@ int cpqhp_set_irq (u8 bus_num, u8 dev_num, u8 int_pin, u8 irq_num)
}
-/*
- * WTF??? This function isn't in the code, yet a function calls it, but the
- * compiler optimizes it away? strange. Here as a placeholder to keep the
- * compiler happy.
- */
-static int PCI_ScanBusNonBridge (u8 bus, u8 device)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static int PCI_ScanBusForNonBridge(struct controller *ctrl, u8 bus_num, u8 * dev_num)
{
u16 tdevice;
@@ -231,9 +221,9 @@ static int PCI_ScanBusForNonBridge(struct controller *ctrl, u8 bus_num, u8 * dev
/* Yep we got one. bridge ? */
if ((work >> 8) == PCI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE_CLASS) {
pci_bus_read_config_byte (ctrl->pci_bus, PCI_DEVFN(tdevice, 0), PCI_SECONDARY_BUS, &tbus);
+ /* XXX: no recursion, wtf? */
dbg("Recurse on bus_num %d tdevice %d\n", tbus, tdevice);
- if (PCI_ScanBusNonBridge(tbus, tdevice) == 0)
- return 0;
+ return 0;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
