H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:04:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> I'd also suggest to flip around the subject line from x86/pci to >>> pci/x86 - it's more of a PCI patch than a pure x86 patch. The >>> same problem could affect other platforms too i suspect. >> Not all platforms expose the root bridge in PCI configuration space. >> Intel ia64 platforms do have a materialised root bridge; HP's don't. >> (I don't know whether Intel ship any PCIe ia64 machines or not). I >> don't remember details for other platforms, but I think Intel is the odd >> one out in this regard. >> > > It's still generic PCI code, however. If there is no host bridge > exposed in PCI space, the patch is a noop. ok, will split that patch to two 1. one touch pci.c 2. and one touch x86/pci. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
