On Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:59 pm Alex Chiang wrote: > We only want to disable ASPM when the last function is removed from > the parent's device list. We determine this by checking to see if > the parent's device list is completely empty. > > Unfortunately, we never hit that code because the parent is considered > an upstream port, and never had an ASPM link_state associated with it. > > The early check for !link_state causes us to return early, we never > discover that our device list is empty, and thus we never remove the > downstream ports' link_state nodes. > > Instead of checking to see if the parent's device list is empty, we can > check to see if we are the last device on the list, and if so, then we > know that we can clean up properly. > > Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx> Applied to my for-linus branch, thanks. Let me know if you have a problem with it (fast) Shaohua! :) -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
