On Monday 05 January 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Rename two functions and rearrange code in drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > > so that it's easier to follow. In particular, separate invocations > > of the legacy callbacks from the rest of the new callbacks' code. > > > > No functional changes should result from this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > > > > @@ -504,17 +504,21 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device > > struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver; > > int error = 0; > > > > + if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev)) { > > + error = pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND); > > + goto Exit; > > + } > > + > > if (drv && drv->pm) { > > if (drv->pm->suspend) { > > error = drv->pm->suspend(dev); > > suspend_report_result(drv->pm->suspend, error); > > } > > - } else if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev)) { > > - error = pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND); > > } else { > > pci_pm_default_suspend(pci_dev); > > } > > > > Does this mean that pci_has_legacy_pm_support() => !(drv && drv->pm) ? Yes, it does. > Should pci_has_legacy_pm_support() check for that and WARN() in case > both sets of callbacks are set? Yes, I think I can add a WARN_ON() in there. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html