Re: [PATCH 2/3 REBASEv2] pci-acpi: Remove unnecessary _OSC evaluation for control request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:22 +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
> Remove unnecessary _OSC evaluation for control request.
> 
> If a control had already been granted, we don't need to re-evaluate
> _OSC for it because firmware may not reject control of any feature it
> has previously granted control to.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Reviewed-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx>

>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-next.28rc4/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next.28rc4.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ linux-next.28rc4/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ acpi_status pci_osc_control_set(acpi_han
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> +	/* No need to evaluate _OSC if the control was already granted. */
> +	if ((osc_data->control_set & ctrlset) == ctrlset)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	if (!osc_data->is_queried) {
>  		status = __acpi_query_osc(osc_data->support_set, osc_data);
>  		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux