On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:07:00AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > > t_slot->hpc_ops->get_adapter_status(t_slot, &value); /* Check if
> > > slot is occupied */
> > >- if (value && pciehp_force) {
> > >+ if (value && (pciehp_force || pciehp_passive)) {
> > > rc = pciehp_enable_slot(t_slot);
> > > if (rc) /* -ENODEV: shouldn't happen, but deal with it */
> > > value = 0;
>
> This code no longer runs in the pciehp_passive case. However, by the
> looks of it it still does in the resume case - that probably wants
> fixing.
Thinking about this - you said that the problem occurs because
pciehp_force=1 causes it to try to enable an already enabled slot, and
then tries to power down the slot as a result? It sounds like this code
should actually be checking whether the return value is ENODEV or
EINVAL, and in the latter case not powering the slot down. That sounds
like a separate bugfix that I'll send later on.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
