On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 04:00:32AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> -static inline void make_slot_name(char *buffer, int buffer_size, struct slot *slot)
> -{
> - snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%d", slot->number);
> -}
> +
> + scnprintf(name, SLOT_NAME_SIZE, "%d", slot->number);
So ... we're using %d here and %u in acpiphp. Obviously we don't expect
to get a number above 2 billion, but I think if we do have some utterly
bogus firmware that gives us a number above 2 billion, printing a
positive number is a better user experience than a negative number.
We clearly have a common pattern here where hotplug drivers have a
number insteaqd of a name (I would venture this is the most common).
Maybe we need a common helper? I think this is a subject for the
long-term todo list, not something that needs to be addressed in the
context of this patch series.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
