On Monday 30 June 2008 23:00:02 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Monday, June 30, 2008 1:40 pm Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Monday 30 June 2008 20:42:30 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Monday, June 30, 2008 11:35 am Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > When CONFIG_PCI=n, there is no stub for pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(), > > > > so add one like other similar stubs. Otherwise there can be build > > > > errors, as here: > > > > > > > > linux-next-20080630/drivers/ssb/main.c:1175: error: implicit > > > > declaration of function 'pci_set_consistent_dma_mask' > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Applied to linux-next, thanks Randy. > > > > I guess this is probably also needed for 2.6.26. > > Hm, current upstream seems to have pci_set_consistent_dma_mask under > CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST, which in turn depends on PCI = y (or PCI = SSB, what does > that mean?). > > But yeah, it wouldn't hurt to push this for 2.6.26 too. Yeah, I wasn't talking about ssb, but rather other drivers. Maybe there's no such user of that function, however. -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
