* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday, June 13, 2008 1:40:21 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > No, I haven't seen any problems on real platforms; I noticed this > > > problem while doing bringup on a simulator. The simulator has some > > > other issues that make probing non-existent sub-functions a bad idea. > > > > > > :) On most machines it'll be an unnoticeable speedup (yay). > > > > ok, good. Do you still think we should do the change and go back to > > the old behavior? To me the old behavior sounds more robust, even if > > it has no real effect. > > Well, I'm a bit biased in this case, but yeah I like the old behavior > better. So if you're ok with it, I can queue it up for 2.6.27 (it > should get at least a little linux-next exposure). sure. It's even a fair v2.6.26 item IMO, as it's a bugfix. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
