On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:14 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following four patches have been sent to Len for a couple of times, but > > he hasn't taken them. Still, as they are targeted at 2.6.27, I'd like them > > to get some testing in linux-next. > > > > The first patch is against ACPI, but PCI is one of the two users of the > > function it modifies (the other one is PNP). The next patch is directly > > related to PCI, but depends on [1/4] (IIRC). > > > > The last two patches, [3/4] and [4/4], are technically agaist ACPI, but > > [4/4] depends on the patches that introduce the new PM callbacks, already > > in your tree, so it seems reasonable to merge them through your tree to > > avoid conflicts with ACPI. > > > > Please include these patches into your tree if possible. > > Sure, I can take 1, 2 and 4, but 3 seems totally ACPI specific. Len can you > pick it up? Jesse, simplest thing i think is to pull from my suspend branch, merge that with your dependent PCI change, and then add #4. if any of these patches need revision or re-basing, then we'll need to coordinate, otherwise the tools should be happy. cheers, -Len git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git suspend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html