Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] implement lightweight guard pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:24:13AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:13:26 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Userland library functions such as allocators and threading implementations
> > often require regions of memory to act as 'guard pages' - mappings which,
> > when accessed, result in a fatal signal being sent to the accessing
> > process.
> >
> > The current means by which these are implemented is via a PROT_NONE mmap()
> > mapping, which provides the required semantics however incur an overhead of
> > a VMA for each such region.
> >
> > With a great many processes and threads, this can rapidly add up and incur
> > a significant memory penalty. It also has the added problem of preventing
> > merges that might otherwise be permitted.
> >
> > This series takes a different approach - an idea suggested by Vlasimil
> > Babka (and before him David Hildenbrand and Jann Horn - perhaps more - the
>
> Nit.  s/Vlasimil/Vlastimil/ ;)

Ugh oops sorry Vlastimil! This was a silly typo... Andrew would you mind fixing
this up? I'll edit my local file for this so if I respin this will be corrected.

Thanks!

>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux