Re: [PATCH] hppa: Wire up cacheflush syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John David Anglin <dave.anglin@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2024-07-09 9:41 a.m., Sam James wrote:
>> In this instance, I wonder if we should do the extra checks. The kernel
>> instability because of the cache / TLB issues means at least one of our
>> machines runs an older kernel for now. (Dave's latest patches seem to
>> help a lot there, but you get the point.)
> Can you be more specific?  Do you still experience instability due to cache / TLB issues
> on this machine?

Sorry for the delay. Our main machine, 'muta', has been suffering
instability for a while. It ended up also having bad RAM and failing
disks. We've now replaced them last night.

We had a lot of kernel crashes since then but after upgrading to
6.10.11, everything seems okay so far. Fingers crossed, and then I can
get back to the other bits (like testing the binutils patch).

(The panics were all in pte_offset_map_nolock.)

>
> Dave

thanks,
sam





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux