Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri,  8 Mar 2024 06:38:07 +0100 you wrote:
> set_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.
> 
> Check its return and take it into account as an error.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/7
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7d2cc63eca0c
  - [bpf-next,v3,2/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e60adf513275

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux