On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:50:02 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> > > When called acpi_processor_post_eject() unconditionally make a CPU > not-present and unregisters it. > > To add support for AML events where the CPU has become disabled, but > remains present, the _STA method should be checked before calling > acpi_processor_remove(). > > Rename acpi_processor_post_eject() acpi_processor_remove_possible(), and > check the _STA before calling. > > Adding the function prototype for arch_unregister_cpu() allows the > preprocessor guards to be removed. > > After this change CPUs will remain registered and visible to > user-space as offline if buggy firmware triggers an eject-request, > but doesn't clear the corresponding _STA bits after _EJ0 has been > called. > > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx> LGTM Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
