On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:43:49PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > There is no harm to hold sparse_irq lock until the upcoming CPU completes > in cpuhp_online_idle(). This allows to remove cpu_online() synchronization > from architecture code. Uuuuuhh.. damn. Can you at the very least ammend the comment near irq_lock_sparse() to mention these extra duties?
