On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:00:11AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: > On 2/28/23 23:57, Al Viro wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:22:31PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: > > > > > Now I can confirm (with the adjusted reproducer), that your patch > > > allows to kill the process with SIGKILL, while without your patch > > > it's not possibe to kill the process at all. > > > I've tested with a 32- and 64-bit parisc kernel. > > > > > > You may add > > > Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> # parisc > > > to the patch. > > > > > > If you want me to take the patch (with the warning regarding missing msg variable fixed) > > > through the parisc tree, please let me know. > > > > What message do you prefer there? It matters only for the case when > > we are hitting an oops there, but... > > I have no preference on that message. Maybe "Page fault: fault signal on kernel memory" > is too generic, so I'm fine with any better idea/wording you come up with. Ended up going with that... Series reordered and pushed out in #fixes. Status: m68k, riscv, hexagon, parisc: tested by arch maintainers alpha, sparc: locally tested (both sparc32 and sparc64 parts) ia64, microblaze, nios2, openrisc: builds, but I have no way to test the resulting kernels (itanic box appears to be pining for fjords and I've no emulator setup for that, the other three I don't even have userland to test with).
