On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:02:31 +0200 "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > v1->v2: Change the commit message to clearly explain why these functions > > should require pointers to const void. The fundamental argument > > behind the commit message changes is semantic correctness. > > Obviously, there are no changes to the code. > > Many thanks to David Sterba and Ira Weiny for suggestions and > > reviews. > > > > arch/parisc/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 6 +++--- > > arch/parisc/kernel/cache.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/highmem-internal.h | 10 +++++----- > > mm/highmem.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > @Andrew: > > Ira Weiny asked David Sterba for taking this patch through his tree because > it is a pre-requisite for a patch to fs/btrfs. He agreed with the above- > mentioned suggestion, however I suppose that an ACK by you is needed. > > Can you please take a look at this patch and say what you think about it? Looks OK to me. It's one of those "if it compiles, it's good" things. I don't believe the patch has ever appeared on linux-mm? Please send it there for some review then go ahead and merge it up.
