On 23/05/2022 18:31, Helge Deller wrote: > Hello Guilherme, > > On 5/23/22 22:40, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: >> On 28/04/2022 13:55, Helge Deller wrote: >>> [...] >>> You may add: >>> Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> # parisc >> >> Hi Helge, do you think would be possible to still pick this one for >> v5.19 or do you prefer to hold for the next release? > > Actually, I'd prefer if you push this patch together with the whole > series upstream at once. The patch itself makes not much sense without > your series... > >> I'm working on V2, so if it's merged for 5.19 I won't send it again. > > Helge Sure Helge, I guess I can do that - will resubmit for V2. But notice the patch is self-contained, as it fixes a current issue in the code - the risk for a lockup due to spinlock taking on atomic context. It doesn't require the panic refactor to be merged in order to achieve its goal... I agree that such issue is rare to trigger though, so definitely no hurry is needed =) Cheers, Guilherme
