28.11.2021 04:23, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 09:00:58PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Replace legacy pm_power_off with kernel_can_power_off() helper that
>> is aware about chained power-off handlers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/emif.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/emif.c b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>> index 762d0c0f0716..cab10d5274a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/emif.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>> @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static irqreturn_t emif_threaded_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> dev_emerg(emif->dev, "SDRAM temperature exceeds operating limit.. Needs shut down!!!\n");
>>
>> /* If we have Power OFF ability, use it, else try restarting */
>> - if (pm_power_off) {
>> + if (kernel_can_power_off()) {
>> kernel_power_off();
>> } else {
>> WARN(1, "FIXME: NO pm_power_off!!! trying restart\n");
>
> BTW, this part of the code seems to be better moved to generic code that
> could replace POWER_OFF request with REBOOT like it is done for reboot()
> syscall.
Not sure that it can be done. Somebody will have to verify that it won't
break all those platform power-off handlers. Better to keep this code
as-is in the context of this patchset.
