Re: Cycle offset is larger than allowed by the 'jiffies' clock's max_cycles value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sonntag, 14. März 2021, 12:16:11 CET schrieben Sie:
> On 3/14/21 10:47 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 3. März 2021, 15:29:42 CET schrieb Helge Deller:
> >> On 3/1/21 7:44 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> >>> Am Montag, 1. März 2021, 17:49:42 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> >>>> Am Montag, 1. März 2021, 17:25:18 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> >>>>> After upgrade to 5.11 get this multiple times per second on my C8000:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> [   36.998702] WARNING: timekeeping: Cycle offset (29) is larger than
> >>>>> allowed by the 'jiffies' clock's max_cycles value (10): time overflow
> >>>>> danger [   36.998705]          timekeeping: Your kernel is sick, but
> >>>>> tries
> >>>>> to cope by capping time updates
> >> 
> >> I know I have seen this at least once with a 32-bit kernel in qemu as
> >> well....
> >> 
> >>>> Not 5.11, but 5.10.11. 5.10.4 is fine. It could be a bad upgrade
> >>>> attempt,
> >>>> I'll retry once I have built a proper 5.11 kernel.
> >>> 
> >>> Ok, it's there also in 5.11.2:
> >> You don't see it in 5.11, but in 5.11.2.
> >> Sadly none of the changes between those versions seem related
> >> to this problem.
> >> 
> >> Do you still see this?
> >> I'd like to get it anaylzed/fixed.
> > 
> > Me too. What do you need?
> 
> I actually don't know.
> First of all it would be great if we could reproduce it.
> Right now I don't see this issue any longer, so I have nowhere to start
> from.

I get it every time if I boot that kernel.

Eike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux