On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:54:01AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:36:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I really don't like all the open coded smarts in the various drivers. > > What do you think about a helper like the one in the untested patch > > A helper function will be actually better. I was thinking of > one yet not very sure about the naming and where to put it. > > > below (on top of your series). Also please include the original > > segment boundary patch with the next resend so that the series has > > the full context. > > I will use your change instead and resend with the ULONG_MAX > change. But in that case, should I make separate changes for > different files like this series, or just one single change > like yours? > > Asking this as I was expecting that those changes would get > applied by different maintainers. But now it feels like you > will merge it to your tree at once? I guess one patch is fine. I can queue it up in the dma-mapping tree as a prep patch for the default boundary change.
