On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 03:19:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > hm. Applying linux-next to this series generates a lot of rejects against > powerpc: > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 akpm akpm 493 May 25 15:06 arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c.rej > -rw-rw-r-- 1 akpm akpm 6461 May 25 15:06 arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c.rej > -rw-rw-r-- 1 akpm akpm 447 May 25 15:06 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c.rej > -rw-rw-r-- 1 akpm akpm 623 May 25 15:06 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c.rej > -rw-rw-r-- 1 akpm akpm 1408 May 25 15:06 arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c.rej > > the arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c ones aren't very trivial. > > It's -rc7. Perhaps we should park all this until 5.8-rc1? As this is a pre-condition for the set_fs removal I'd really like to get the actual changes in. All these conflicts seem to be about the last three cleanup patches just doing renaming, so can we just skip those three for now? Then we can do the rename right after 5.8-rc1 when we have the least chances for conflicts.
