Re: [PATCH V3 07/15] arch/kunmap_atomic: Consolidate duplicate code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 08:49:39PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:

[ ... ]

> > 
> > ---
> > # bad: [bdecf38f228bcca73b31ada98b5b7ba1215eb9c9] Add linux-next specific files for 20200515
> > # good: [2ef96a5bb12be62ef75b5828c0aab838ebb29cb8] Linux 5.7-rc5
> > git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v5.7-rc5'
> > # good: [3674d7aa7a8e61d993886c2fb7c896c5ef85e988] Merge remote-tracking branch 'crypto/master'
> > git bisect good 3674d7aa7a8e61d993886c2fb7c896c5ef85e988
> > # good: [87f6f21783522e6d62127cf33ae5e95f50874beb] Merge remote-tracking branch 'spi/for-next'
> > git bisect good 87f6f21783522e6d62127cf33ae5e95f50874beb
> > # good: [5c428e8277d5d97c85126387d4e00aa5adde4400] Merge remote-tracking branch 'staging/staging-next'
> > git bisect good 5c428e8277d5d97c85126387d4e00aa5adde4400
> > # good: [f68de67ed934e7bdef4799fd7777c86f33f14982] Merge remote-tracking branch 'hyperv/hyperv-next'
> > git bisect good f68de67ed934e7bdef4799fd7777c86f33f14982
> > # bad: [54acd2dc52b069da59639eea0d0c92726f32fb01] mm/memblock: fix a typo in comment "implict"->"implicit"
> > git bisect bad 54acd2dc52b069da59639eea0d0c92726f32fb01
> > # good: [784a17aa58a529b84f7cc50f351ed4acf3bd11f3] mm: remove the pgprot argument to __vmalloc
> > git bisect good 784a17aa58a529b84f7cc50f351ed4acf3bd11f3
> > # good: [6cd8137ff37e9a37aee2d2a8889c8beb8eab192f] khugepaged: replace the usage of system(3) in the test
> > git bisect good 6cd8137ff37e9a37aee2d2a8889c8beb8eab192f
> > # bad: [6987da379826ed01b8a1cf046b67cc8cc10117cc] sparc: remove unnecessary includes
> > git bisect bad 6987da379826ed01b8a1cf046b67cc8cc10117cc
> > # good: [bc17b545388f64c09e83e367898e28f60277c584] mm/hugetlb: define a generic fallback for is_hugepage_only_range()
> > git bisect good bc17b545388f64c09e83e367898e28f60277c584
> > # bad: [9b5aa5b43f957f03a1f4a9aff5f7924e2ebbc011] arch-kmap_atomic-consolidate-duplicate-code-checkpatch-fixes
> > git bisect bad 9b5aa5b43f957f03a1f4a9aff5f7924e2ebbc011
> > # good: [0941a38ff0790c1004270f952067a5918a4ba32d] arch/kmap: remove redundant arch specific kmaps
> > git bisect good 0941a38ff0790c1004270f952067a5918a4ba32d
> > # good: [56e635a64c2cbfa815c851af10e0f811e809977b] arch-kunmap-remove-duplicate-kunmap-implementations-fix
> > git bisect good 56e635a64c2cbfa815c851af10e0f811e809977b
> > # bad: [60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29] arch/kmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate code
> > git bisect bad 60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29
> > # good: [7b3708dc3bf72a647243064fe7ddf9a76248ddfd] {x86,powerpc,microblaze}/kmap: move preempt disable
> > git bisect good 7b3708dc3bf72a647243064fe7ddf9a76248ddfd
> > # first bad commit: [60f96b2233c790d4f1c49317643051f1670bcb29] arch/kmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate code
> 
> I'm confused by this.  This points to an earlier commit being bad?
> 

Yes, you are correct. I was looking up the wrong commit; it had a similar
subject line. Sorry for the confusion.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux