On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 18.09.19 00:51, John David Anglin wrote: > > On 2019-09-17 5:36 p.m., Arlie Davis wrote: > >> Likewise, I'm at a loss for testing with real hardware. It's hard to > >> find such things, now. > > How does de2104x compare to ds2142/43? I have a c3750 with ds2142/43 tulip. Helge > > or some others might have a machine with a de2104x. > > The machines we could test are > * a C240 with a DS21140 tulip chip (Sven has one), > * a C3000 or similiar with DS21142 and/or DS21143 (me). > > If the patch does not show any regressions, I'd suggest to > apply it upstream. 2114x chips use a different driver, so it won't help here. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
