On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:22 PM Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 07.02.19 18:46, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:21 PM Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Add performance-optimized versions of the strlen, strcpy, strncpy and > >> strcat string functions. > > > > Can you say anything else about them? > > No. > > > E.g., are you using some feature that the compiler isn't able to > > generate? > > Some assembler instructions are used which the compiler doesn't > use by default for such use cases. > > > Do you have performance data? > > Not yet. > Maybe someone wants to do that? > > > Except for strlen, they look like straightforward translations of the > > simple C implementations. > > The code is much smaller than what the compiler generates and > the layout of the bytes-stores are targetted the behaviour of > the parisc 64bit CPUs. So is that the rationale? I'm not sure how anyone can offer review if they don't know what you're trying to accomplish.
