On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100 > > > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also > > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no > > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit. > > I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping > work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed > you wanted to merge it via your tree. > > I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window, > so it could very easily go through your tree. > > Let me know if you still want me to merge this. These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies. That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through the dma-mapping tree.
