I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c b/drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c index 42ec460..416fa51 100644 --- a/drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static unsigned long piranha_bad_128k = 0; #ifdef SBA_AGP_SUPPORT static int sba_reserve_agpgart = 1; -module_param(sba_reserve_agpgart, int, 0444); +module_param(sba_reserve_agpgart, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(sba_reserve_agpgart, "Reserve half of IO pdir as AGPGART"); #endif -- 2.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
