On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> +#else
>>> +#define generic_rtc_ops *(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> static int __init generic_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct rtc_device *rtc;
>>> + const struct rtc_class_ops *ops;
>>> +
>>> + ops = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
>>> + if (!ops)
>>> + ops = &generic_rtc_ops;
>>
>> I hope no compiler version treats "&*(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL" as
>> undefined behavior?
>
> Yes, that is guaranteed, the operations cancel each other (6.5.3.2#3: If
> the operand is the result of a unary * operator, neither that operator
> nor the & operator is evaluated and the result is as if both were
> omitted).
Thanks for confirming.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
