On Sat, 26 Dec 2015, Helge Deller wrote: > On 26.12.2015 13:09, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > BTW. I looked at this in arch/parisc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:set_huge_pte_at > > "*ptep = entry;" and it seems like a bad bug. PA-RISC doesn't have atomic > > instructions to modify page table entries, so it takes spinlock in the TLB > > handler and modifies the page table entry non-atomically. If you modify > > the page table entry without the spinlock, you may race with TLB handler > > on another CPU and your modification may be lost. > > Right. > > > The comment says something about double locking on pa_tlb_lock, but > > pa_tlb_lock isn't held when that function is called. > > I have a work-in-progress patch for that in one of my trees, e.g.: > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/commit/?h=parisc-next&id=5c76b525cbdb097401f46522b27b1eb6244f34f9 > It's lightly tested though. > > Helge I tested the patch and it works OK for me so far. BTW. what happens if some kernel code takes the TLB spinlock and then TLB miss in kernel space happens? (it would attempt to lock the spinlock recursively) Is it assumed that the TLB is big enough that this can't happen? Mikulas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
