Hello, On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote: > Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for > both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs(). All achitectures that do > not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by > dma-mapping-broken.h. > > Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, > but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs(). > > As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only > compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs > where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc). > > arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------ > arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ > arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ > arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------ > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best way to have this patch series merged? Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture separately? Thank you, Damian -- Damian Hobson-Garcia IGEL Co.,Ltd http://www.igel.co.jp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html