Hello,
On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
> Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for
> both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs(). All achitectures that do
> not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by
> dma-mapping-broken.h.
>
> Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y,
> but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs().
>
> As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only
> compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs
> where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc).
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------
> arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++
> arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++
> arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best
way to have this patch series merged?
Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture
separately?
Thank you,
Damian
--
Damian Hobson-Garcia
IGEL Co.,Ltd
http://www.igel.co.jp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
