On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 06:14:01PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > On 23-Jan-13, at 4:17 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > >On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:33:48PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >>On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Thibaut VARENE > >><T-Bone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>It looks to me like this burden clearly outweighs the benefits of > >>>being selfhosted, so maybe the right move is to use a supported > >>>architecture for hosting the website? Given the "audience" for > >>>linux-parisc, I don't think it would make a significant > >>>difference... > >> > >>I tend to agree. Use the right tool for the right job. > >> > >>Fun hacking = HPPA. > >> > >>Serve the website = x86. > > > >fyi, the subnet on which palinux (aka parisc-linux.org) is hosted will > >be going away at the end of February. This sounds like a good target > >date for the move :) > > There are a few people who still use the domain for parisc related mail. > James Bottomley is the most active. Hopefully, this will also get moved > with the website. Yeah, I agree - it just needs somewhere to move to first :) We can also just point the MX somewhere else, if there's a good mail hosting option that doesn't want to host the website. Note that it sounds like HP might be willing to move the system to a new DC, re-IP and basically run it till something fails. But that's an inevitable eventuality, and at that point it becomes an emergency. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
