On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:58:45PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Anyway, should I resend the patchset with this thing fixed? > > Please feel free to do so. ;-) > > Thanx, Paul > So here it is. On the menu for the updated branch: - fixed stable tags (use # 3.3+) - not sure what to do with "alpha: Fix preemption handling in idle loop", tag as stable or not? - added tested-by Michael Cree <mcree@xxxxxxxxxxxx> for alpha patches - propagate rename to rcu_user_*_after_irq() in the commit changelog - remove trailing #endif in "rcu: New rcu_user_enter_after_irq() and rcu_user_exit_after_irq() APIs" and early rcu_user_hooks_switch() header as well (reported by WU Fenguang). - add rcu_user_hooks_switch() header in "rcu: Switch task's syscall hooks on context switch" I believe this all should also fix what WU Fenguang reported: [rcu:rcu:next 54/82] include/linux/rcupdate.h:202:20: error: redefinition of 'rcu_user_exit' [rcu:rcu:next 54/82] include/linux/rcupdate.h:401:19: error: redefinition of 'rcu_read_lock_bh_held' [rcu:rcu:idle 2/27] include/linux/rcupdate.h:969:2: error: #endif without #if I'm not reposting the patches because few things have actually changed, except a few neats and some stuff that have been moved from a patch to another to unbreak bisection. But the end result is about the same. You can check the difference with a git diff between our branches. If you want to, though, I can repost the patches. This is pullable from: git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git rcu/idle-for-v3.7 Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
