On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What NO_IRQ problem do you mean? There is
> #define NO_IRQ (-1)
> in arch/parisc/include/asm/irq.h.
That's the one he means.
Switching it to zero and testing that things still work would be appreciated.
Much code already knows that NO_IRQ is supposed to be zero, and
there's tons of drivers that just do the (correct!) "if (!dev->irq)"
kind of thing.
Any architecture that has a non-zero NO_IRQ is basically broken.
Always has been.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
