Re: TLB Miss Bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24-Nov-11, at 8:16 AM, John David Anglin wrote:

So, my theory is there is a bug in the TLB miss handling. Somehow a data miss ejects the instruction entry, and we get into a loop inserting I and D TLB entries. Sometimes the machine gets out of the loop but it takes
hours.


The TLB conf is:

D-TLB conf: sh 3 page 1 cst 1 aid 0 pad1 0
I-TLB conf: sh 3 page 1 cst 1 aid 3 pad1 0

I believe the sh value indicates either pitlb or pdtld may be used (i.e., there is just one shared tlb) on rp3440.
Thus, the above scenario seems possible.

Dave
--
John David Anglin	dave.anglin@xxxxxxxx



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux